A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099449.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 3147 ready for pronouncement and merging

[Python-Dev] PEP 3147 ready for pronouncement and merging [Python-Dev] PEP 3147 ready for pronouncement and mergingTerry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Fri Apr 16 20:09:37 CEST 2010
On 4/15/2010 11:01 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> pyc files inside of the `__pycache__` directories contain a magic
>> identifier in their file names.  These are mnemonic tags for the
>> actual magic numbers used by the importer.  For example, in Python
>> 3.2, we could use the hexlified [10]_ magic number as a unique
>
> (Aside: when you search Wikipedia for "hexlify" it says "did you mean:
> heavily?" :-)

I regard 'hexlify', as used in binascii, to be a misspelling of 
'hexify', whether it originated with Python or elsewhere. 'Hexify' 
itself may not be an official dictionary word but it at least follows a 
normal pattern of derivation. I have not bothered to say anything before 
because correcting the misspelling of the module function would break 
back compatibility. But I think its usage should stop there.

Terry Jan Reedy

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4