On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Ronald Oussoren <ronaldoussoren at mac.com> wrote: > > On Friday, April 16, 2010, at 04:57PM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >>Mark Dickinson <dickinsm <at> gmail.com> writes: >>> >>> Okay; I'll open an issue for deprecation in 3.2 and removal in 3.3. >>> >>> Can this sneak in under the 'incorrect language semantics' exemption >>> for PEP 3003 (the moratorium PEP)? If not, then deprecation >>> presumably has to wait for 3.3. >> >>It seems that in spirit the moratorium applies more to language additions than >>to removals/limitations. The goal being that alternate implementation stop >>chasing a moving target in terms of features. >> >>So IMVHO it is fine for 3.2. > > What about 2.7, should it be deprecated there as well? I think so. Compatibility with PyPy, Jython and IronPython is only going to become more important. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4