On Friday, April 16, 2010, at 04:57PM, "Antoine Pitrou" <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >Mark Dickinson <dickinsm <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> Okay; I'll open an issue for deprecation in 3.2 and removal in 3.3. >> >> Can this sneak in under the 'incorrect language semantics' exemption >> for PEP 3003 (the moratorium PEP)? If not, then deprecation >> presumably has to wait for 3.3. > >It seems that in spirit the moratorium applies more to language additions than >to removals/limitations. The goal being that alternate implementation stop >chasing a moving target in terms of features. > >So IMVHO it is fine for 3.2. What about 2.7, should it be deprecated there as well? Ronald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4