On 16/04/2010 17:06, Mark Dickinson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Antoine Pitrou<solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > >> Mark Dickinson<dickinsm<at> gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Okay; I'll open an issue for deprecation in 3.2 and removal in 3.3. >>> >>> Can this sneak in under the 'incorrect language semantics' exemption >>> for PEP 3003 (the moratorium PEP)? If not, then deprecation >>> presumably has to wait for 3.3. >>> >> It seems that in spirit the moratorium applies more to language additions than >> to removals/limitations. The goal being that alternate implementation stop >> chasing a moving target in terms of features. >> >> So IMVHO it is fine for 3.2. >> > Removing it certainly seems in keeping with the goal of making life > easier for alternate implementations. (Out of curiosity, does anyone > know what IronPython does here?) > Same as Jython and PyPy: IronPython 2.6.1 (2.6.10920.0) on .NET 2.0.50727.4927 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> dict(**{1: 'hi'}) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: expected string for dictionary argument got 1 >>> Michael > I've opened http://bugs.python.org/issue8419 > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4