Mark Dickinson <dickinsm <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Okay; I'll open an issue for deprecation in 3.2 and removal in 3.3. > > Can this sneak in under the 'incorrect language semantics' exemption > for PEP 3003 (the moratorium PEP)? If not, then deprecation > presumably has to wait for 3.3. It seems that in spirit the moratorium applies more to language additions than to removals/limitations. The goal being that alternate implementation stop chasing a moving target in terms of features. So IMVHO it is fine for 3.2. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4