Brian Curtin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:20, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com > <mailto:techtonik at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com > <mailto:ncoghlan at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>> I am surprised to see that the bug-tracker > >>> doesn't have an OS classifier or ability to add > >>> tags ? Since a number of issues reported seem to > > Just to remind about my +1 for user editable tags. > > > -sys.maxint on just about anything user editable except for the title or > messages on an issue. I don't think user editable tags on an issue bring > anything to the table except making it seem more "web 2.0". Searching > user-generated tags would be a nightmare because you'd have to know > every combination of some idea in order to get relevant results (e.g., > windows, windoze, window$, win32). > Yes, tight vocabulary control will lead to more consistent classifications. regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 See PyCon Talks from Atlanta 2010 http://pycon.blip.tv/ Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/ UPCOMING EVENTS: http://holdenweb.eventbrite.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4