On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > I see the confusion. I think Martin meant more about open issues that required discussion, not simply issues that had a patch ready to go. Ach. I hit 'send' too soon. I also wanted to say: it seemed quite clear to me that Martin specifically meant "simply issues that had a patch ready to go". Quoting him exactly: >> Please understand that setting the state of an issue to "review" may *not* be the best way to trigger a review - it may be more effective to post to python-dev if you truly believe that the patch can be committed as-is. It seems that perhaps the core developers have slightly different opinions about this? :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100415/5c80e241/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4