On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > I see the confusion. I think Martin meant more about open issues that required discussion, not simply issues that had a patch ready to go. I'm curious - if one isn't supposed to ping the mailing list every time, how does one ask the tracker "please show me all the issues which have a patch ready to go that hasn't been reviewed / responded to / rejected or applied"? It seems like patches sometimes linger for quite a while and often their workflow-state is highly unclear (to me, at least).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4