RetroSearch Browse

Wed Apr 14 09:59:50 CEST 2010 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099277.html

In article <4BC54F4F.4090307 at v.loewis.de>,
 "Martin v. Lowis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:

> > Wasn't that problem fixed weeks ago?  The installer image has been 
> > available there since several days after the release.  And the link 
> > seems fine now.
> 
> The inherent problem remains. There is no binary for 2.7b1, for example.
> The last binaries produced in the 2.7 testing process were for 2.7a2.

That's true.  But there wouldn't be a traditional OS X installer for 
2.7b1 anyway since it turns out it is not possible to build a multi-arch 
installer without patching because of a bug that wasn't caught before 
the code cutoff since there are no OS X buildbots that test that 
configuration.  But, at the moment, there aren't any OS X buildbots at 
all, are there?  That *is* something that the PSF could help with.  I 
would be happy to help with that myself, although my time to do so will 
be very limited for the next few weeks.

-- 
 Ned Deily,
 nad at acm.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-April/099277.html below:

[Python-Dev] Fwd: Broken link to download (Mac OS X)