Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Steve Bonner <pythonsteve <at> gmail.com> writes: > >>What do we think of adding a built-in nonlocals() function that would >>be similar to globals() and locals()? > > These scopes don't have parallel capabilities: Maybe it would be better to deprecate globals() and locals() and replace them with another function called something like scope(). It would return a mapping object that looks up names in the current scope. It could also improve on locals() by being writable. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4