Greg Ewing wrote: >> * Even though the order isn’t important for code, it’s convenient at >> the interactive prompt to see the methods of an item in alphabetical >> order for quick scanning. > > Since I suspect this is most people's main use for > dir(), I think it's a good enough reason for leaving > things as they are. Yes, I was going to point out that I would personally be *very* annoyed if someone removed the automatic sorting from the output of dir() :) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4