Greg Ewing writes: > Peter Moody wrote: > > > I've mentioned at least once (and others have mentioned as well) that > > it's very common, when describing the ip address/prefix of a NIC to > > write, "192.168.1.100/24" > > Yes, but if you want to *retain* all of that information, > the object you have isn't just a "network", it's more > like "network plus the address of its interface". So > some people think that using the name "IPNetwork" for > this object is confusing. Especially since to my mind networks don't have interfaces. Hosts have interfaces. "IPInterface", anyone? ... no, let's not go there, stick a fork in it, it's done.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4