On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Keeping getopt around *and* including a "add_getopt_arguments" > method in > argparse is probably the best of both worlds, in that it allows for > relatively straightforward evolution of an application: > > 1. Start with getopt > 2. As the getopt argument parsing gets twisty and arcane and > maintaining > the help string becomes a nightmare, move to argparse with the > "add_getopt_arguments" method. > 3. Over time, convert more arguments to proper argparse arguments with > full documentation. Maybe. I haven't been following this entire thread, but I don't see much point in making it easy to go from getopt to argparse. The two are so different that I think you're either going to jump all in or not. Maybe that's just me though as I really don't see much use for getopt any more (even for throwaway scripts). -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090929/6dfb7d8d/attachment-0001.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4