Guido van Rossum <guido <at> python.org> writes: > > All in all I think we should change this before it's too late; it will > affect a very small number of apps (perhaps none?), but I would rather > have the right semantics in the future. Also, it's trivial to write > code that doesn't care (in fact code running under 2.x and 3.x > probably will have to be written so that it doesn't care) so it's not > like changing this is going to make life harder for people wanting > multiple-version support. Ok, it sounds reasonable to me :) Now somebody just has to write a patch (it shouldn't be too difficult, since the position restoring code exists in the 2.x file object). Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4