On Sep 27, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Michael Foord wrote: > Brett Cannon wrote: >> I am going to state upfront that I am +1 for this and I encouraged >> Steven to submit this PEP on the stdlib-SIG. I still remember >> watching >> Steven's lightning talk at PyCon 2009 on argparse and being impressed >> by it (along with the rest of the audience which was obviously >> impressed as well). >> >> I think argprase is a good improvement over what we have now (getopt >> and optparse), it's stable, considered best-of-breed by the community >> for a while (as shown as how many times argparse has been suggestion >> for inclusion), and Steven is already a core committer so is already >> set to maintain the code. That covers the usual checklist we have for >> even looking at a PEP to add a module to the standard library. >> >> > > I've used argparse and really like it. I could also have done with > the subcommand support in recent changes to unittest. > > +1 for inclusion. +1 as well. I wish I had been able to use this library for a recent project using sub-commands. Doug
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4