Antoine Pitrou wrote: > This deserves its own PEP IMO, although I'm not sure it would be accepted > (ISTR the idea of a detailed IO exception hierarchy was already refused > in the past). Not as such - a big exception hierarchy rewrite was rejected, but nothing specifically limited to the IO exceptions. Michael's response cut to the heart of the issue though - a richer IO exception hierarchy can make life interesting for compatibility purposes (especially when creating "file-like" interfaces to non-file objects). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4