Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> writes:
> As far as I can see, in practice, people talk about obj[i] as the item
> at index i, not the item at subscript i -- the term "subscript" in
> this context seems to be rare to non-existent except for the error
> message.
Presumably, the same people would also call ‘obj[i]’ the item at *key*
‘i’, if ‘obj’ is a dictionary. For an object that supports neither
indexes nor keys, though, how is Python to know which the user meant?
It's a single operation as far as the parser is concerned, so there
needs to be a single term for it. That term is “subscript”.
Your point about the awkward word “unsubscriptable” is well-taken,
though. Perhaps a simple improvement to the message wording:
>>> foo = 3
>>> foo[6]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'int' object does not support subscripts
>>> foo['spam']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
TypeError: 'int' object does not support subscripts
--
\ “I lost a button-hole.” —Steven Wright |
`\ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4