Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2009/9/23 Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>: > >> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 13:34, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: >> >>> As for burn out, I expected 2.7.x, as the last 2.x release, to be >>> different in that several people would do the maintenance releases >>> (perhaps on a 6 month schedule or so) for the 5 year period, so that >>> would leave me with just 3.2.x (and maybe another 3.1.x release). >>> >> Well, if you want that to happen you should make that clear now as I >> expected you to do the first few micro releases of 2.7. >> > > I will do the first few 2.7 bug fix releases. > > >>>>> Additionally, I'm very apprehensive about doing any kind of release >>>>> without the buildbots running. Does anyone know when they might be up? >>>>> >>>> I don't know the answer, but it might be "never". We used to do >>>> releases without them, so it's not impossible. Just means you have to >>>> really push the alphas, betas, and RCs. >>>> >>> What do you mean "push"? >>> >> Promote. >> > > That basically means we will be relying on 3rd party libraries for our > quality control? > > > Isn't that the real compatibility test *anyway* - how successful a new version of Python is at running all the existing Python code... Michael -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4