-- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com On 22 Sep 2009, at 19:15, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman > <dirkjan at ochtman.nl> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 15:55, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk >> > wrote: >>> ConfigParser recognises both, but other tools (*coff* ConfigObj) >>> only >>> recognises the latter (=). >> >> So does Mercurial, BTW, because this aspect of ConfigParser was >> pretty >> annoying for some of the stuff we try to do (and not at all obvious >> to >> most users, who have never seen anything but = used in config-style >> files). > > yes, I've just used ConfigParser syntax because that's what > Distutils uses. > > If ':' is deprecated in favor of '=' only, Distutils will be fine with > that change. > > I would be +1 for its deprecation > I don't think : is formally deprecated but = is more common and it would be great if distutils could default to (and document) this syntax. Michael > Tarek > > -- > Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org | オープンソースはすごい!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4