Eric Smith wrote: > My only concern with this is a possible performance issue with v6 > networks. Would this be implemented such that [-1] doesn't need to > iterate through the (possibly large) address space of a v6 network? I'm not familiar with v6, but if netmasks work the same way as they do in v4, then there's no need to iterate over anything -- it's just a matter of turning on all the low bits of the address. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4