On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 at 20:29, Peter Moody wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Andrew McNamara > <andrewm at object-craft.com.au> wrote: >>> off to patch the pep and implement some of the non controversial changes. >> >> It might be a good idea to add some use-cases to the PEP. > > There are several use-cases in the PEP already. > > The problem is, for every use-case where one can show that the > existing implementation is confusing, I can come up with a use-case > showing where the existing implementation makes more sense than > anything proposed. Then all of those use cases should be in the PEP, so we can try to find the best refinement we can of the API for handling all of them. --David
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4