On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:59:22AM -0700, Peter Moody wrote: > currently have, or do you feel that simply adding 5 rfc's to the > references section adds to the overall readability of the PEP? I would list them simply because it's not obvious which RFC specifies the format of IP addresses or how they're allocated. e.g. if I search for "rfc ip address format", most of the hits are for RFC 3587, "IPv6 Global Unicast Address Format", which doesn't actually explain IPv6 address syntax. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4