Nick Coghlan wrote: > To be honest, given the indexing behaviour, I'm -1 on the idea of giving > the network address or broadcast address attribute names *at all*. Consider: > > network_address = my_net[0] > broadcast_address = my_net[-1] My only concern with this is a possible performance issue with v6 networks. Would this be implemented such that [-1] doesn't need to iterate through the (possibly large) address space of a v6 network? I think it could (and would) be implemented efficiently, so I'm +1 on not giving these names, but adding this "recipe" to the documentation instead. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4