Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-September/091566.html below:

[Python-Dev] Py_CmpToRich removed, alternatives for comparison?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Bugs discovered by researchers at Case Western Reserve University
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Py_CmpToRich removed, alternatives for comparison?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

For blender we have a number of types defined in the C/API like
meshes, lamps, metaballs, nurbs etc that dont make sense with some of
richcmp's operations.
A problem I have is that in python 3.1 the Py_CmpToRich function is removed.

Should we copy Py_CmpToRich into our source tree?
Otherwise we have fairly long cmp functions that have Py_CmpToRich inline.

For C extension writers what is the suggested method for comparing
types where Py_LT, Py_GT Py_GE etc are not useful?

Since people sometimes ask why use py3.1, we're doing a rewrite that
wont be ready for quite some time.
-- 
- Campbell

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Bugs discovered by researchers at Case Western Reserve University
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Py_CmpToRich removed, alternatives for comparison?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4