On 04:42 pm, olemis at gmail.com wrote: >On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:13 AM, <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com> wrote: >>On 12:48 pm, ctb at msu.edu wrote: >>> >>>[snip] >>> >>>The most *exciting* part of pony-build, apart from the always- >>>riveting >>>spectacle of "titus rediscovering problems that buildbot solved 5 >>>years >>>ago", >>>is the loose coupling of recording server to the build slaves and >>>build >>>reporters. My plan is to enable a simple and lightweight XML-RPC >>>and/or >>>REST-ish interface for querying the recording server from scripts or >>>other >>>Web >>>sites. This has Brett aquiver with anticipation, I gather -- no more >>>visual >>>inspection of buildbot waterfall pages ;) >> >>BuildBot has an XML-RPC interface. So Brett can probably do what he >>wants >>with BuildBot right now. > >... but pony-build follows a different model But BuildBot exists, is deployed, and can be used now, without waiting. (Sorry, I don't really understand what point you were hoping to make with your message, so I just thought I'd follow up in the same style and hope that you'll understand my message even if I don't understand yours :). Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4