A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093431.html below:

[Python-Dev] nonlocal keyword in 2.x?

[Python-Dev] nonlocal keyword in 2.x? [Python-Dev] nonlocal keyword in 2.x?Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Wed Oct 28 15:49:47 CET 2009
<skip <at> pobox.com> writes:
> 
>     >> So 2.7 support will for the most part be a case not of supporting
>     >> Python versions, but Python *users*.
> 
>     Antoine> That's still not a good reason to backport nonlocal. The same
>     Antoine> reasoning could be used to backport new features to the 2.6
>     Antoine> branch after all.
> 
> No, because 2.6 is in feature freeze (bug fixes only).  2.7 is the current
> version of 2.x where new features are allowed to be added.

That was precisely my point. There are development practices which mitigate the
idea that backporting is always helpful to the user.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4