RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 27 02:09:53 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093395.html

On 26Oct2009 22:45, exarkun at twistedmatrix.com <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
| On 04:18 pm, daniel at stutzbachenterprises.com wrote:
| >On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Antoine Pitrou write:
| >Do we really need priority requests at all?  They seem counter to your
| >desire for simplicity and allowing the operating system's
| >scheduler to do
| >its work.
| 
| Despite what I said above, however, I would also take a default
| position against adding any kind of more advanced scheduling system
| here.  It would, perhaps, make sense to expose the APIs for
| controlling the platform scheduler, though.

+1 to both sentences from me.
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

Plague, Famine, Pestilence, and C++ stalk the land. We're doomed! Doomed!
        - Simon E Spero

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093395.html below:

[Python-Dev] Reworking the GIL