RetroSearch Browse

Tue Oct 27 01:02:03 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093394.html

On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:45 PM, exarkun at twistedmatrix.com wrote:
>> Despite what I said above, however, I would also take a default  
>> position against adding any kind of more advanced scheduling system  
>> here.  It would, perhaps, make sense to expose the APIs for  
>> controlling the platform scheduler, though.

I would also like to have an exposed API and optional profiling  
(optional as in conditional compilation, not as in some sort of  
profiling 'flag' that slows down non-profiling runs) so that you can  
see what's going on well enough to use the API to tune a particular  
platform for a particular workload.

S

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093394.html below:

[Python-Dev] Reworking the GIL