On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote: >> P.S. It is weird that this thread is gaining traction at the same >> time as the moratorium thread. Go figure :-) > > I'm beginning to think maybe adding a method to a built-in object type > *should* fall under the moratorium. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum Seems like any changes requiring support from uninvolved developers should fall under the moratorium. If the proposal is to add a set.get() function to the set API, then this clearly falls under that heading. Geremy Condra
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4