> I'm not being tongue-in-cheek or sarcastic. My question was serious -- > if there is a moratorium, is there any reason to bother submitting > patches for functional changes to built-ins? A lot can change between > now and 2013, and I for one wouldn't bother making a patch that I knew > wouldn't even be considered for inclusion for four years, and would > likely need to be re-done even if it was accepted. Guido has said that > the purpose of the moratorium is to discourage changes to the language. I haven't been following the discussion, but I wouldn't expect that a moratorium on language changes would rule out adding a method to the set type. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4