RetroSearch Browse

Fri Oct 23 11:49:06 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093226.html

Brett Cannon wrote:
> Another summit, another potential time to see if people want to change
> anything about the issue tracker. I would bring up:
> 
> - Dropping Stage in favor of some keywords (e.g. 'needs unit test',
> 'needs docs')
> - Adding a freestyle text box to delineate which, if any, stdlib module
> is the cause of a bug and tie that into Misc/maintainers.rst; would
> potentially scale back the Component box

+lots on adding a module field (independent of automatically adding
maintainers to the nosy list, it would assist in "I just did a major
cleanup of module X, are there any old bugs I can kill off").

Of course, it will take a while for the field to be filled in on
existing issues, but even having it be possible would be very nice.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093226.html below:

[Python-Dev] language summit topic: issue tracker