I know I already posted some relevant threads to the other discussion, but I wanted to point out a couple of specific comments on GIL fairness from the discussion: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089752.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-May/089755.html - Phillip On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Tres Seaver <tseaver <at> palladion.com> writes: >> >> I read Sturla as saying there were 99,939 switches out of a possible >> 100,000, with sys.checkinterval set to 100. > > Oops, you're right. > But depending on the elapsed time (again :-)), it may be too high, because > too many switches per second will add a lot of overhead and decrease performance. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/phillip.sitbon%2Bpython-dev%40gmail.com >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4