RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 22 06:45:34 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093159.html

On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 15:21 +1100, Mark Hammond wrote:

>  I'd be very surprised if any applications rely on 
> the fact that each process starts counting at zero, so if someone can 
> come up with a high-res counter which avoids that artifact I'd expect it 
> could be used.

Could you offset it by the system time on the first call?

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091022/619f2ac4/attachment.pgp>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093159.html below:

[Python-Dev] time.clock() on windows