RetroSearch Browse

Thu Oct 15 16:35:30 CEST 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093048.html

skip at pobox.com wrote:
>     Eric> I haven't tested it, but I still see WITHOUT_COMPLEX in trunk and py3k 
>     Eric> branches. In py3k, it's referenced in:
>     ...
> 
> Sure, but is it ever exercised?  A name like WITHOUT_COMPLEX suggests that
> it should be flipped on/off by configure using --without-complex, but that
> script doesn't know about it and it's not mentioned in pyconfig.h.in, where
> the various --with-* flags work their magic.

Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were asking "does setting 
WITHOUT_COMPLEX work?"

No idea about any configure option, sorry.

Eric.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/093048.html below:

[Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?