On Oct 13, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote: > Excellent. That's exactly what I meant. > I quoted the part of the previous message where you proposed to > review another patch for 2.6.5. I guess it was not very clear that > I'm proposing to review this for 2.6.5 as well. Well, at least > we're on the same page now it seems. :-) :) -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 832 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091013/eee9c27c/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4