Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: > I'd much rather have my doctests and float-repr'ing code break on 2.7 so > I can deal with it as part of a minor-version upgrade than have it break > on 3.x and have to deal with this at the same time as the unicode->str > explosion. It feels like a backport of this behavior would make the > 2->3 transition itself a little easier. I'm +0 on making the change, primarily for this reason. We can reuse the vast majority of the code from 3.x. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4