Greg Ewing writes: > That's no reason to squander it, though. Quoting the entire > message every time makes the size of the thread grow as > O(n**2), Agreed, but let's not exaggerate. Threads are finite, so big O is not really relevant. Spam OTOH is boundless, and that's where the bandwidth is going. > and makes things harder to read as well. Indeed, and that's why I thanked Michael. Trimming can be a PITA if you're using a crummy MUA, and for reasons I have no intention of even trying to remember, let alone understand, a lot of people are very attached to their crummmy MUAs. But adding a few words to at least make it a little readable (whether apologetic or factual) would make me a lot happier ... given that they're going to top post anyway.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4