On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Chris Withers <chris at simplistix.co.uk> wrote: > >> So I am adding this in Distutils for 2.7. > > NB: There was no consensus on this "micro-language" on distutils-sig. > While I suspect I don't care as none of my packages rely on anything other > than other python packages, others did care, and I found the syntax Tarek > was proposing pretty clumsy. Please no bikeshedding again on the syntax. "consensus" doesn't mean that you agreed on the syntax. As I said to MAL, a PEP will be written with the precise syntax, and you will be able to make your voice heard on **Distutils-SIG**, even participate to it. But at the end, a syntax will be added. > Does the PEP386 or the changes you're proposing for PEP314 cater for the > extra_requires stuff in setuptools? I know I use that quite heavily and I'm > not the only one... Let's open a thread on Distutils-SIG about PEP 314 planned changes. Tarek.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4