Paul Moore wrote: > 2009/10/9 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > >> Ian Bicking <ianb <at> colorstudy.com> writes: >> >>> Someone mentioned that easy_install provided some things pip didn't; >>> outside of multi-versioned installs (which I'm not very enthusiastic >>> about) I'm not sure what this is? >>> >> http://pip.openplans.org/#differences-from-easy-install >> >> If it's obsolete the website should be updated... >> > > Specifically, combine "only installs from source" with "might not work > on Windows" and the result is pretty certainly unusable for C > extensions on Windows. You can pretty much guarantee that the average > user on Windows won't have a C compiler[1], and even if they do, they > won't be able to carefully line up all the 3rd party C libraries > needed to build some extensions. > > Binary packages are essential on Windows. > Definitely. Most Windows users won't have any compilers let alone 2. Michael > Paul. > > [1] Heck, some extensions only build with mingw, others only build > with MSVC. You need *two* compilers :-( > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4