A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/092654.html below:

[Python-Dev] eggs now mandatory for pypi?

[Python-Dev] eggs now mandatory for pypi? [Python-Dev] eggs now mandatory for pypi?Chris Withers chris at simplistix.co.uk
Tue Oct 6 15:00:24 CEST 2009
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Really? I can understand package owners not being able to add
> recommendations for their own packages, but if they can't add comments
> how are they meant to correct misunderstandings or redirect
> inappropriate messages to the correct forums?

Indeed, yet another reason I would like to have the option to disable 
comments for my packages. I make sure there are advertised mailing lists 
available for all my packages, and they are all much for featureful than 
PyPI should ever hope to be...

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2872293&group_id=66150&atid=513503

cheers,

Chris

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4