Tarek Ziadé wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >> >> The only question is, given that 2.6.x is supposed to be a bug-fix branch, do we >> want to fix that incompatibility with a widely deployed existing piece of >> software? Whether or not the incompatibility is legitimate (i.e., whether >> setuptools is badly written and relies on implementation details) is beyond the >> point, IMO. > > Right. As discussed with Barry, I will work on an internal special > case in Distutils in the 2.6 maint. > branch so it fixes the incompatibility with the Setuptools 0.6c9 release. You could add a selective work-around that just triggers if setuptools has been loaded on the 2.6 branch. if sys.modules.has_key('setuptools'): # monkey-patch fix-up setuptools to work with the new code ... or the other way around: if sys.modules.has_key('setuptools'): # undo r1234 to make setuptools 0.6c9 happy again ... -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Oct 05 2009) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4