A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/092567.html below:

[Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting

[Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formatting [Python-Dev] transitioning from % to {} formattingPaul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Mon Oct 5 10:41:08 CEST 2009
2009/10/5 Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip at yahoo.co.uk>:
> Raymond Hettinger <python <at> rcn.com> writes:
>> We should get one written.  ISTM, every %-formatting
>> string is directly translatable to an equivalent {}-formatting string.
>
> I'm not sure you can always get equivalent output from the formatting, though.
> For example:
>
>>>> "%0#8x" % 0x1234
> '0x001234'
>>>> "{0:0>#8x}".format(0x1234)
> '000x1234'
>>>>
>
> Someone please tell me if there's a better {}-format string which I've missed!

Ironically,

>>> "0x{0:0>6x}".format(0x1234)
'0x001234'

ignoring the # modifier altogether...

Paul.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4