A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-October/092515.html below:

[Python-Dev] summary of transitioning from % to {} formatting

[Python-Dev] summary of transitioning from % to {} formatting [Python-Dev] summary of transitioning from % to {} formattingPaul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Sat Oct 3 18:08:13 CEST 2009
2009/10/3 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
> Steven Bethard <steven.bethard <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>   If %-formatting is to be deprecated, the transition strategy here
>>   is trivial. However, no one has yet written translators, and it is
>>   not clear what heuristics should be used, e.g. should the method
>>   just try %-formatting first and then {}-formatting if it fails?
>
> This would be a reasonable heuristic. It should be done only on the first call,
> though, and then the result remembered (for both performance reasons and
> consistency).
>
> The cases where a format string would function in both formatting styles and
> expect the same parameters must be very rare in the real world.

Define "fails":

>>> "{a} {b} c" % {'a':12}
'{a} {b} c'

That didn't fail...

Paul.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4