A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094350.html below:

[Python-Dev] Removal of intobject.h in 3.1

[Python-Dev] Removal of intobject.h in 3.1 [Python-Dev] Removal of intobject.h in 3.1"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Mon Nov 23 21:12:25 CET 2009
> I'm not sure concealing the differences between 2.x and 3.x behind such a
> wrapper is a good idea. It would be better if people became aware of / learnt
> about the new semantics.

+1. When porting a larger code base, I always came up with a custom set
of macros, specific to the way the modules were written in the package I
ported. In particular for PyString_, some of the code meant to deal with
bytes, other code with text. There was no way to tell, short of reading
and understanding the code. As you'll have to review the complete code,
anyway, the savings you gain by using macros somebody else wrote are
really minor.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4