Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094291.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Arc Riley <arcriley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Having a "Repository-URL", "Repository-Browse-URL" and a
>> "Bug-Tracker-URL" field in PyPI would be a lot more usefule then
>> comments and ratings.
>>
>
> +1

You mean in the Metadata ? We are currenty working on adding fields in them,
for an upcoming 1.2 version (see PEP 345)

I am crossposting to distutils-sig so we can discuss this point over
there, because I think that would
be a great triple of fields to add in 1.2

Tarek

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4