Benjamin Peterson wrote: > 2009/11/15 Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk>: >> Well, personally I think it would be a good thing if this raised an >> exception during bytecode compilation - but it would fall under the >> moratorium and have to wait a few years. > > It could probably be considered a bug, though, since the global > statement in that case silently has absolutely no effect. > It wouldn't be adding a new feature, but it would be changing the behaviour of programs that currently have 'global' outside a function. Perhaps, due to the moratorium, there should be a warning before it's actually corrected.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4