A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094217.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*? [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Nov 14 09:45:04 CET 2009
Paul Moore wrote:
> 2009/11/13 Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com>:
>> I can see the information about the poll, and a link to view the
>> results, without logging in.
>>
>>  http://pypi.python.org/pypi
>>
>> (second paragraph there).  That paragraph tells you that you need to log
>> in to vote in the poll.
> 
> I don't want to create a PyPI account (more account details I'll
> rarely use to remember) just to vote. I can see why anonymous votes
> are bad, but the sample's going to be self-selecting - people like me
> who don't want to create an account will be excluded.

This is indeed intentional: people like you won't upload packages to
PyPI, nor will they take part in the rating system, as both require
a PyPI account.

Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4