Matthew Woodcraft wrote: > Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: >> Why do you think it is okay to combine the Disallow vote, without also >> combining the Allow vote? Less than a third of the total votes are in >> favour of disallowing comments, with two-thirds in favour of allowing >> them. > > I don't. I was giving one example of the problem with the plan of not > combining options at all. > > I wasn't writing to take sides. I was trying to say that using 'first > past the post' voting with five options which are combinations of > different issues (comments, ratings, whether to allow package owners to > opt out) can't be expected to give a good decision. > > I think there is no safe way to pick a winner from this vote (unless > more than half the voters choose a single option). > > > (As a general point, in any discussion it tends to be unhelpful to ask > "Why do you think X" unless the person you're asking has clearly > indicated that they do in fact think X.) > Perhaps Approval voting should be used: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approval_voting
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4