Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-November/094196.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:17:40 am Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:

> This "poll" business is just smoke and mirrors, anyway -- notice the
> way the "no comments" votors are split among three choices, while the
> "pro comments" voters have just two choices.

What?

Allow ratings and comments on all packages (status quo)
Allow package owners to disallow comments (ratings unmodified)
Allow comments, but only send them to package owners (ratings 
unmodified)
Disallow comments (ratings unmodified)
Disallow ratings and comments (status three months ago)

That's three choices for allowing comments, two for disallowing.




-- 
Steven D'Aprano

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PyPI comments and ratings, *really*?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4