On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 14:52, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote: >> And they do: nan != 0 returns False. Maybe I'm missing your point >> here? > > Aargh! True! I meant to say True! Huh. Somewhere along the line I lost track of how python handled NaN. I thought "comparisons always evaluate to false" was the rule. -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4